The answer is yes. But the cost must not be a disaster. In fact, much of the free energy that could be used could be converted into useful power by modern technology, such as grid-connected plants like those in the United Kingdom. In this regard, the United States may already be catching up.
The question is how to get it. “There’s a lot of energy available on the planet,” says Stephen Deere, the director of renewable energy at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory. “If you can do this cheaply, you can certainly build lots of power plants and get the energy that’s available.”
Most of the available cheap electricity comes from wind and solar; these sources are usually very clean. But what about burning coal? With a few exceptions, this source contains many problems. For example, when coal is burned, it’s the burning process that releases the pollutants known as black carbon into the atmosphere, which is a known human-caused source of climate change. As Deere sees it, “If you have a little bit of cheap electrical energy, you should be able to use it.” But to make this happen, coal is “not necessarily the most economically viable option.”
This is where nuclear comes in.
For a long time, the United States has been the world’s most promising energy frontier. With the exception of Japan, the United States has dominated the energy production in the world, both at home and abroad. And thanks to the nation’s vast natural gas resources, it has begun to make a push for its own green power.
In 2002, the Nuclear Energy Institute, a group representing the nuclear power and nuclear weapons industries, launched a study titled “Putting Options on the Table.” The study sought to identify the various ways the world could build nuclear power to supply a growing global demand and reduce its carbon footprint. Among the options under consideration were “fast reactors,” such as Fast Breeder Reactor (or FRB or Fast Breeder Fuel Cycle), fast reactors that use a new reactor design rather than existing ones and reprocessing of uranium that can be done at sea.
Two years later, in 2005, the Obama administration announced the Strategic Nuclear Reserve (SNR). The SPR will have one thousand warheads and a “capability for deployment as needed,” according to the Obama administration. The administration also announced that the Strategic Capabilities Review (SCR) would address an array of strategic arms control concerns, including “counterproliferation” and ”
tesla free energy schematics minecraft, how to make free energy generator pdf motor, free energy generator for sale in pakistan toyota 2015, most advanced free energy magnetic motors pdf compressor, standard free energy change definition chemistry